MotoGP’s approach to handling injured riders has come under scrutiny after Guenther Steiner expressed confusion over teams leaving bikes unused during race weekends when no replacement rider is available.
Steiner, who recently entered the MotoGP paddock through his role at Tech3, questioned why machines are sometimes left in the garage instead of being put into action with stand-in riders. His perspective is shaped by his Formula 1 background, where teams are expected to always field a car if possible.
The discussion was highlighted during a difficult situation for the Tech3 team involving rider Maverick Viñales, who was forced to miss races following shoulder surgery. In his absence, no replacement was confirmed in time for certain events, leaving the team effectively running reduced participation for the weekend.
Source: BlackBook Motorsport
According to comments shared within the paddock, Steiner finds this approach unusual compared to Formula 1, where reserve drivers are more routinely available and expected to step in when needed. The contrast has sparked debate about whether MotoGP should adopt a more structured system for substitute riders.
The topic has also revived wider conversations in the sport about introducing mandatory reserve riders. Supporters argue it would improve competitiveness and avoid empty grid slots, while others point out that MotoGP’s physical demands and safety risks make last-minute substitutions more complex than in car racing.
MotoGP is currently in discussions about potential changes to its structure and operations, and the issue of rider replacements may become part of future regulatory considerations as the championship continues to evolve.
